What is 23 19 24

  • BGH, 04.10.2019 - AnwZ (Brfg) 81/18

    Admission as an in-house lawyer through a legal activity in ...

    The Senate has not yet decided on the legal question of whether the requirements of Section 46 (5) BRAO are only met if the employer is exclusively advised and represented by a lawyer (see BGH, decision of May 24, 2019 - AnwZ (Brfg) 23/19, juris marginal no. 2).

  • BGH, May 20, 2020 - AnwZ (Brfg) 59/19

    Admission as an in-house lawyer through qualification of the activity as ...

    If necessary, the question of how the involvement of the party summoned by client advisors in customer relationships is to be qualified and whether the admission as in-house lawyer is to be denied if the party summoned is not exclusively active in legal matters of her employer (cf. May 2019 - AnwZ (Brfg) 23/19, juris marginal no. 2).

  • BGH, May 20, 2020 - AnwZ (Brfg) 62/19

    Admission as in-house lawyer in the context of work as ...

    Furthermore, the question will have to be investigated whether the admission as in-house lawyer is to be denied because the summoned party is involved in the settlement of claims (... Senate resolution of August 16, 2019 - AnwZ (Brfg) 58/18, NJW 2019, 3453 para. 23 ff.) and is therefore not exclusively active in legal matters of her employer (see Senate resolution of May 24, 2019 - AnwZ (Brfg) 23/19, juris marginal no. 2).